Digital Identity

NIST SP 800-63 Gap Assessment & Readiness Consulting

We help organizations align with NIST SP 800-63 (IAL, AAL, FAL) requirements and prepare for Kantara Initiative conformance where needed. Our work covers 800-63A (identity proofing), 800-63B (authentication), and 800-63C (federation) across both Revision 3 and the final Revision 4 suite released in July 2025 — as readiness support, not official certification.

Why teams engage us

Common reasons teams come to us

  • A government or regulated relying party requires a specific IAL, AAL, or FAL level.
  • A Kantara Initiative conformance assessment is on the horizon and scope is unclear.
  • Identity proofing (800-63A) workflows have never been formally reviewed against NIST guidance.
  • Authenticator, session, and MFA design (800-63B) needs to move beyond ad-hoc decisions.
  • Federation, assertions, and SSO (800-63C) span multiple partners and need a coherent security review.
  • The team wants to align FIDO2, OIDC, and SAML choices to 800-63 assurance targets.
Who it's for
  • Identity providers (IdPs) and credential service providers (CSPs)
  • Federation partners integrating with government or regulated relying parties
  • SaaS, fintech, payments, and health-tech IdPs aligning to 800-63 assurance levels
  • Regulated B2B teams asked for a specific IAL, AAL, or FAL by a customer
  • Teams preparing for a Kantara Initiative conformance assessment
What's included
  • Target IAL (Identity Assurance Level), AAL (Authenticator Assurance Level), and FAL (Federation Assurance Level) selection
  • Gap assessment against NIST SP 800-63-3 and the final SP 800-63-4 suite (July 2025)
  • Identity proofing workflow review (800-63A)
  • Authenticator, session, and MFA design review (800-63B)
  • Federation, assertion, and SSO design review (800-63C)
  • Kantara Initiative conformance readiness and evidence preparation
  • Alignment with adjacent identity standards (FIDO2, OIDC, SAML)
Coverage

What 800-63 readiness covers

Assurance-level targeting

Select realistic IAL, AAL, and FAL levels based on relying-party and regulatory needs.

Identity proofing (800-63A)

Review remote and in-person proofing workflows, evidence, and fraud controls.

Authentication (800-63B)

Authenticators, sessions, MFA, recovery, and re-authentication design review.

Federation (800-63C)

Assertion, SSO, and federation architecture review across OIDC and SAML partners.

Kantara conformance readiness

Scope, control mapping, and evidence preparation for a Kantara Initiative assessment.

Adjacent identity standards

Alignment with FIDO2, OIDC, and SAML choices so the identity stack tells one story.

Benefits
  • Target the right assurance levels for your relying parties and use cases
  • Enter a Kantara conformance assessment with scope, controls, and evidence organized
  • Reduce identity-related risk of account takeover and federation abuse
  • Give regulated buyers a clear, standards-based identity posture
Typical outputs
  • Digital identity scope and assurance-level target
  • Gap assessment across 800-63A, 800-63B, and 800-63C
  • Remediation roadmap for identity proofing, authentication, and federation
  • Kantara conformance evidence plan
Process

Four steps from scope to action

  1. 01

    Define the scope

    Confirm identity flows, relying parties, users, and target IAL, AAL, and FAL.

  2. 02

    Assess the environment

    Review proofing, authentication, sessions, recovery, and federation against NIST guidance.

  3. 03

    Prioritize the findings

    Rank identity gaps by assurance impact, security risk, and implementation effort.

  4. 04

    Deliver the action plan

    Provide an engineering and evidence roadmap for the target assurance levels.

FAQ

Questions we hear most